Washington DUI Hearing on State Toxicology Lab Problems Could Loom Large

Troubles at the Washington State Patrol toxicology lab have prompted DUI attorneys to mount protests in district court concerning more than 50 DUI cases, and the ultimate decision could have a wide-ranging impact on hundreds to even thousands of other cases.

Earlier this week, two Skagit County judges began to hear about the problems at the state toxicology lab and how they could be detrimental to DUI cases throughout Washington.

The major issue at hand concerns how the lab produces and tests an ethanol-water solution which essentially ensures that the state's breathalyzer machines are working properly.

Back in July, the state lab's former manager, Ann Marie Gordon, abruptly resigned after being accused more than once of signing statements that she had tested the solution when she really hadn't.

Washington DUI attorneys will call Gordon to testify in this hearing. Gordon is expected to plead the fifth, or in other words, invoke her right against self-incrimination. King County prosecutors are still deciding on what course of action to take with her.

Washington DUI attorneys have also detailed another alarming problem at the state toxicology lab. These Washington DUI lawyers have asserted that a computer glitch at the lab led to inaccurate data for the ethanol-water solution.

Why does this matter? Well, the ethanol-water solution must be mixed in a precise ratio in order to produce the most accurate breathalyzer readings. In other words, one slight mistake in the mixing of the solution could produce faulty breathalyzer readings and potential loopholes in DUI cases.

The Washington State Patrol has denied that the accuracy of the breathalyzer results has been compromised. Nonetheless, Washington DUI attorneys are asking the judges to do one of two things: either dismiss the DUI charges against more than 50 people or kick the results of the breath tests in those cases out of court

A Seattle Post-Intelligencer story detailed that a Skagit County deputy prosecutor and an assistant Seattle city attorney will continue to press forward with using the breath test results as evidence against the suspects.

The story also indicated that the judges will likely use testimony from this hearing, which has just started with DUI attorneys questioning scientists at the lab and could take a couple of months to conclude, as the basis for making decisions in hundreds to thousands of similar, upcoming cases.

Total DUI will keep you updated on the developments of this interesting hearing, which reveals once again an important lesson to anyone suspected of DUI based on a breath test: breathalyzers are far from 100-percent certain and may often be challenged in DUI cases.


» Back to DUI Articles



PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. This Web site is a group advertisement. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total DUI is not a law firm. The sole basis for the inclusion of the participating lawyers or law firms is the payment of a fee for exclusive geographical advertising rights. Total DUI does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Total DUI may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Alabama, Florida, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.