The Truth about DUI Breath Tests


If you're facing charges of DUI (driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs), you may feel like you have little to no chance of being acquitted. But, as a DUI lawyer can tell you, that's simply not the case. New reports from DUI lawyers around the country show once again that some of the "evidence" commonly accepted in DUI cases may not be as accurate as once believed.

A blog by a Texas DUI lawyer recently drew attention to the issue of officer testimony during a DUI trial. Apparently, part of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Manual (SFSTM) includes instructions on how officers should testify in the courtroom.

The SFSTM reportedly reminds officers that they have not been instructed in the internal workings of breath testing machines like the Intoxilyzer 5000, and indeed do not need to understand the machine beyond how to operate it during a DUI arrest.

The manual allegedly also discourages officers from researching the accuracy of breath testers on their own, insisting that adequate research has been conducted and has proven the reliability of the breathalyzer.

But, as one DUI lawyer's blog points out, at the time of most breath tests, only the arresting officer and the DUI suspect are present, meaning that neither person involved has an understanding of the breath machine being used. And the results of that machine's test could play a major role in the suspect's DUI case.

A DUI lawyer from Minnesota points out on his blog that, because of the way breathalyzers calculate BAC (blood alcohol content), a variety of factors not related to alcohol can cause an incorrect reading. Basically, breath machines measure the concentration of alcohol in your breath and use a pre-set formula to estimate how much alcohol is in your blood.

That formula is based on an "average person," but does not reflect the actual breath alcohol to blood alcohol ratio of every person tested.

Plus, because of the type of data breathalyzers rely on, a variety of factors have been shown to cause incorrect readings, including:

  • Hyperventilation and/or differences in deep & shallow breathing;
  • Giving a breath sample lasting longer than 10 seconds;
  • Individual differences in body composition and size;
  • Nearness of breathalyzer to other radio-wave emitting equipment;
  • Presence of certain non-alcoholic chemicals (including some used in carpentry);
  • Certain illnesses; and
  • Temperature of breath.

One DUI lawyer in Connecticut has reportedly even suggested that Intoxilyzer machines over-estimate the BAC of black people, women and those who are shorter than average.

And a California DUI lawyer points out on his blog that the company that produces the Intoxilyzer only offers a one-year warranty for the product. This has raised some eyebrows, since many police forces evidently use their breath-testing machines for as long as ten years each!

» Back to DUI Articles

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total DUI is not a law firm.  Your request for contact will be forwarded to the local lawyer who has paid to advertise in the ZIP code you provide. Total DUI does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network nor does it analyze a person's legal situation when determining which participating lawyers receive a person's inquiry. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total DUI does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Do not use the form to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 400, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here or call 866-200-8052.

FLORIDA ONLY: Total DUI is considered a lawyer referral service in the state of Florida under the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct. By all other standards, Total DUI is a group advertisement and not a lawyer referral service.

If you live in Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.